Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pio of Pietrelcina/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 15:06, 14 August 2007.
It's a very good article for Padre Pio. Green Owl Uh uh
Without giving it a detailed look I can tell you the lead is too short. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 04:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - not bad article, but I'm afraid I'll not support yet. Lead is short, from the first glance I think one or two more paragraphs should be written. Not sure about wording, but from section "Desire to become a friar", "it is said" doesn't sound well. And third, although references are sufficient (haven't checked reliability), they need balancing, as sections "Supernatural phenomena" and "Sainthood" and possibly others are weakly or not sourced at all, and most of the references need formatting for author, access date, etc. and merging same pages into one. MarkBA t/c/@ 11:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Inadequate WP:LEAD, rambling TOC with WP:MSH issues, unformatted citations (see WP:CITE/ES; all sources need a publisher, websources need a last accessd date, author and publication date should be given when available), citation needs (example, Half a million people were estimated to have attended the announcement ceremony.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.