Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pilot (Awake)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 14:47, 2 June 2012 [1].
Pilot (Awake) edit
Pilot (Awake) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Tate Brandley Stockwell 15:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because it meets criteria. If there are issues. I will fix them, so that it can be promoted. Thank you. Tate Brandley Stockwell 15:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- I only see one edit to the page under this username, adding a template. Have you notified the primary contributors to this article? - Dank (push to talk) 16:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't worry Dank, I have this on my watchlist, so I could see it. I don't know about DAP, though. Guy546(Talk) 16:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I have sent a message to DAP388, the original creator. Tate Brandley Stockwell 17:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't worry Dank, I have this on my watchlist, so I could see it. I don't know about DAP, though. Guy546(Talk) 16:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments I'd recommend a thorough copy-edit and a peer-review before anything is done, just to be safe.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: While I would love to see this article pass the featured article criteria, I would also recommend a peer review and a copyedit from someone who is very familiar with the process. Prose is not one of my strongest points. —DAP388 (talk) 17:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The nominator opened a peer review a couple of hours after nominating at FAC, presumably in response to the above comments. One of the principal contributors has also suggested a peer review, a sensible step as there is no evidence in the edit history that the article has gone through any preparation for featured article nomination. Articles cannot be simultaneously on PR and FAC, so this nomination should be withdrawn and reviewer attention switched to the peer review. Brianboulton (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Brian. The second, messy sentence drew me here: "with two parallel realities; : in one
reality, his wife Hannah (Laura Allen) is alive and his son Rex (Dylan Minnette) is dead, ;whilein an alternative reality his son is alivewhileand his wife is deceased." Tony (talk) 08:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.