Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Parliament of Australia/archive1

Parliament of Australia

I believe this article should become a featured article as it is nuetral, clear and concise and would fill the void of the lack of Australian featured articles. It clearly explains the roll and purpose of the Parliament of Australia.

Object. No references. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object per above. The prose is uncompelling: e.g., how many times must the article reiterate the inferior status of territories and new states in apportionment? Also, the election results should go at the end.

Refer to peer review--Peta 06:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So why are undated years linked (e.g., "1984)? And on the other side, why is one of the dates not auto-formatted? Tony 16:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]