Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Newshounds/archive1

Newshounds edit

This is a self-nomination. I believe that this article should be featured, as it is very stable, contains relevant images, and is referenced. It also has already been given the status of good article. ISD 09:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Try and expand on the lead. It should have a broad overview of the topic in question as well as a few major facts from the main body of the article. --Skully Collins _{Review Me! Please?} 11:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am worried that all of the sources are from an official site. Hasn't there been any outside commentary? I am also worried that about half of the content is bulleted information on characters. I would oppose... but, I'll wait to see other comments. gren グレン 13:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Describes the topic well, but doesn't give any sense of what's notable about it. Is the comic especially popular? Well reviewed? Controversial? Newshounds is listed as a topic of high importance to webcomic coverage on Wikipedia, but the article lacks context that would give the reader an idea of what's interesting about it, other than that it exists. Also, needs more sources other than Newshounds itself and the official site. -- (Lee)Bailey ^(talk) 14:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object, as above. Plus, list centric. Fieari 18:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object, fully concur with Lee Bailey. Jeronimo 08:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per above, and too cuttered. Michael 05:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]