Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Movieland/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by Raul654 05:05, 11 March 2009 [1].

---

Movieland

Nominator(s): ViperSnake151

This article has alot of good detail, and I managed to get it back up to good article status a few months ago, cleaning it up and arranging it better. There has not been any coverage of any "positive" aspects of this site, and its pretty much just notable for its spyware. ViperSnake151 20:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Tech. comment from Truco (talk · contribs) -- Dabs and external links (toolbox), and ref formatting (WP:REFTOOLS) are found up to speed.--₮RUCӨ 00:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

• User:Juliancolton/dash –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 05:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments -

• Please spell out abbreviations in the notes

Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose 1b. This doesn't look comprehensive at all to me. There is no information about the history of the website, only history of the complaints. Who developed it? The Overview section is a paltry paragraph that details its ads on other sites. Describe its services and what kind of content it offers. If it's a subscription-based movie download website, what kinds of movies does it claim to offer? Mainstream studio releases? BuddingJournalist 21:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.