Self-nomination. I'm pretty proud of the work I've done (and will continue to do) on this article, and quite frankly I'm curious to see what other opinions of the piece will be. Hence my seeking out more objective opinions. ;) Cjmarsicano 07:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object 1. too many subheadings. Please reduce them 2. No references. =Nichalp«Talk»= 07:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object - Too many subheadings. Too many short paragraphs, some sections read like a list, especially the Illness and Recovery section. Try and make the prose flow more. And Illness and Recovery is a totally misleading section title. - Hahnchen 16:49, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Too many subheadings, too many short sentences/paragraphs. Too many links to non-existant articles, and a very messy Discography section. There's a lot of work to be done, refer to WP:Peer review. — Wackymacs 22:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I cleaned up the Discography section and several other aspects of the article, but I still Object for the moment. — Wackymacs 19:36, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose. Good article, but it needs a good proofreading and cleaning up. It's close, but not quite there. And, as I've said on other FAC's, the references are inadequate. PedanticallySpeaking 16:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Same with PedanticallySpeaking... great article, only let down by a lack of references. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
