Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lal Masjid siege/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 00:03, 15 February 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I have extensively worked on it. Updated it, corrected information, added citations. Article is fairly stable and thus worthy of this nomination. Mercenary2k (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Your references should be cited using {{cite web}} templates. Seegoon (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cite templates are not a requirement of WP:WIAFA; consistently formatted citations are. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking at pure Google hits, "Siege of the Lal Masjid" and "Siege of Lal Masjid" seem to be more common than the present title (and are the more typical way of naming sieges, besides; cf. WP:MILMOS#NAME). Is there any particular reason why the current one was chosen? If it's arbitrary, I'd suggest moving the article to the more common variant. Kirill 02:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this is still up for GA nomination, from 30 December 2007. Ealdgyth | Talk 17:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
CommentOppose Refs should include the publisher, author, publishing date and access date. Epbr123 (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: nominator has not edited the article since the nomination, issues raised above not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.