Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ickenham/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 15:55, 25 October 2011 [1].
Ickenham edit
Ickenham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Harrison49 (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the featured article criteria in all respects. Harrison49 (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- FN 3: page(s)?
- Check for minor inconsistencies like doubled periods
- FN 71: italicization
While sources are generally reliable, I'm seeing a fairly high percentage of non-third-party sources. Can you explain this? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for having a look through. These are the best for covering the facts included within the article. Most are for the separate sports clubs in Ickenham, but others are for organisations who have produced the most detailed histories of themselves available. Harrison49 (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyscape check - No issues were revealed by Copyscape searches. Graham Colm (talk) 12:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't think this is yet the finished article. One example: the Transport section is four very short paragraphs. And another: the Education section tells us that the library was closed for a year for refurbishment. What has that to do with Education (as opposed to public services) and why is it worthy of note in an encyclopedia article? Malleus Fatuorum 01:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to request this nomination be closed to allow me to work on Malleus Fatuorum's comments. Harrison49 (talk) 10:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.