Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Drill bit/archive1

Drill bit

How to write a great article about something seemingly banal

Object. There are several sections marked as "under construction", I don't think it's ready for this yet. Also, you didn't put the FAC tag on the talk page. Leithp 11:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object – "under construction"? just one reference? There are too many headings, if you intend this to be a list of drill bit types, then WP:FLC would be an appropriate place to nominate. =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It's a work in progress... right now we're mostly working on other WikiProject Metalworking tasks. Might be best to wait until it's looking closer to done. Bushytails 19:22, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object: Unfinished. Little more than an explained but incomplete list than a featured article. Giano | talk 10:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object: This seems more like a category waiting to happen. I'm not sure that putting all this in one article serves Wikipedia well, and even when finished I doubt it could really make it as a unified whole, much less an FA. Daniel Case 05:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OBJECT You can't seriously be considering putting this article on the main page? Terribly written. Most, if not all, sections are small & pathetic. Plus, weigh this option: Historical article of use to mankind, or drill bit. Historical article of use to mankind, drill bit. Historical article, drill bit. Seems a no brainer to me! Spawn Man 02:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Definately expand (or just get rid of), the 'under construction' sections. It wouldnt look too bad without them Astrokey44 11:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]