Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/David Hume/archive1

Good A-Class. Eyu100 04:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Looks promising to me. The prose is interesting and flowing. The section organization is odd though:
- Footnotes should be at the bottom, shouldn't they?
- References are partly numbered, partly bulletized... if the bulleted ones are not referenced, don't they belong in "Further reading"?
- David Hume#Perspectives of Hume - isn't this supposed to appear sometime further up, rather than after the "See also" and "Further reading" sections?

--Zvika 15:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object: I think that the article would need a section on Hume as an historian: Hume's history was one of the best fruits of 18th century historiography, and deserves to be discussed. Also, I find Piotrus' points very sound.--Aldux 11:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Not enough references: there entire unreferenced sections. Perspectives has lots of tiny paras, and works is a not-very-pretty-but-long list.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 22:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]