Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Codex Carolinus/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 18:47, 11 December 2010 [1].
Codex Carolinus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because it is complete. All available sources were used. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - This appears unprepared, especially with regard to the quality of writing. It needs a thorough copyedit at the very least, to bring it up to a professional standard of writing—it contains basic grammatical errors. --Andy Walsh (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Leszek, you will always need a native speaker to give your stuff a good copyedit before sending it to FA. In addition the context of the MS and the meaning of the technical terms used would need a fair amount of expansion for FA. Johnbod (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.