self-nom This article discusses what we know about a significant settlement of an essential civilization/Culture of Northern Portugal and North-western Spain, which we still know very little despite there are so many vestiges in both countries. This article can be seen as a summary of the book José Manuel Flores Gomes & Deolinda Carneiro Subtus Montis Terroso - Património Arqueológico no Concelho da Póvoa de Varzim Câmara Municipal da Póvoa de Varzim, 2005 as it is the only book purposely written about it. So I don’t think we need to put inline citations, any doubt one should buy that book, unfortunately there is not much information on the Internet.--Pedro09:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. "So I don’t think we need to put inline citations, any doubt one should buy that book,". No. Even if I buy the book, I need page numbers indicating where to find specific referenced passages. FAs must be referenced. Sandy12:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
it is referenced, see the references section. But if that's the main problem, I can get the book again, and make inline citations. --Pedro13:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There are now inline citations. I'm still putting more while I'm search for info on the books. --Pedro 16:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)*Finish.--Pedro18:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Needs a copy-edit; worth putting effort into it, because there's a lot of good in this article.
Why are the years blue? Perhaps links might be focused enough for the ancient years, but certainly not "1961" or "20th century", etc.
Can you fix the spelling of "meter", which is something you put coins into. (I presume that this is in BrEng.) This is clumsy: "152 metres height (about 500 feet)". Relocate "height and remove "about".
Second para in lead is a stubby single sentence. There are other stubby paragraphs in the main text.
I see a ref citation with an extraneous space after it. And perhaps remove the spaces between multiple citations?
"After the death of Rocha Peixoto, in 1909, some rocks of the Cividade had been used"—No, "were".
"The visit of UNESCO's inspectors is foreseen for 2007." Better: "A visit from UNESCO's inspectors is foreseen for 2007." Is there a reference for this assertion?
"Archelogical".
The interior "possessed" floors?
"In some points of the city, vestiges of sewers or narrow channels had been discovered; these would serve to direct rain water." Would serve? No, just "served". Check tenses and moods throughout.
Peer review won't be prompt enough, since you've already nominated it here. You need to actively recruit interested copy-editors. Research similar topics via their history pages to identify the right people. Tony04:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
no problem, the aim is to create a good article, not to get a star on it. This article really needs more work, I'll work on the Portuguese version first as it needs more info on religion and currency. --Pedro10:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]