Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beavis and Butt-head/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was withdrawn 14:27, 8 April 2008.
Beavis and Butt-head edit
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it is one of the best articles on Beavis and Butthead on the internet and certainly in any encyclopedia. Well-researched, well written, with copious sources and vivid images, this article certainly deserves the title. JeanLatore (talk) 04:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stong oppose. This article would not even make GA status. Try aiming there first before attempting an FA. bibliomaniac15 Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 04:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I suggest you list this article at WP:PR to get some opinions about the article's quality. At the moment, it does not meet the FA criteria or the GA criteria. There are a number of {{citation needed}} tags, a {{cleanup}} tag from July 2007, and there's just an overall lack of references. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not love) 06:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose I saw only five different inline references, which is inadequate for this topic.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Lacks citations, several sources are questionable, has a cleanup-tag, large chunks of the article are bulleted lists, may have fair use concerns on the screenshots, unencyclopedic tone in the writing (use of contrations, etc.). I would not pass this for GA as it stands. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.