Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archaeology/archive1

Archaeology edit

After reading this article, I thought that it was a featured article. I then realized that it wasn't and I couldn't find a single reason why it shouldn't be. It is detailed, has good pictures, and all-in-all, a really great article. American Patriot 1776 01:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No inline references. --Cloveious 03:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In-line references, lead section too short, prose choppy with many one sentence paragraphs. Also I recommend a peer review before FAC. Joelito 05:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, good points, I think that it should be withdrawn pending a peer review. American Patriot 1776 00:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]