Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apple/archive3
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 10:16, 18 July 2010 [1].
Apple edit
Apple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I think this is a good enough article to hit the main page. TEK (talk • e-mail) 03:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Were the primary contributors to this article consulted before this nomination, as per FAC instructions? Dabomb87 (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose: Three links to dab pages and three dead external links (see the toolbox to the right). Also, substantial portions of the article are unreferenced, one section is tagged as containing OR and needing more citations, and the references are poorly and inconsistently formatted. Is there really so little to tell about "History" and "Botanical aspects"? I suggest withdrawing this article and taking it to PR instead, after fixing the problems I mentioned. Ucucha 06:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.