Wikipedia:Factual review/reviews/Pipes (example) (one)

Pipes edit

Pipes — factual review initiated on March 19, 2008.

Due to the fact that the article on "Pipes" covers an important topic, has not been factually reviewed before, and appears to be well-written, I request that it be factually reviewed. — Thomas H. Larsen 08:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article sections edit

If you wish to participate in this factual review, and you are reasonably knowledgeable about the topic of the article, please assign your name to one or more of the sections listed below. You should be knowledgeable in the sections you intend to review. More than one editor can review one section, but all sections of the article must be reviewed.

Summary edit

Factual reviewers: Plumber, Piper

The "Summary" section of the article claims that "... pipes are useless ...", which appears (a) unverifiable, and (b) heavily biased. — Piper

The "Summary" section claims that "... pipes are always grey ...", which is most definitely inaccurate and unverifiable. — Plumber

Uses of pipes edit

Factual reviewers: PipeUser, Pied Piper, Plumber

Types of pipes edit

Factual reviewers: SquarePipe, Pied Piper, Round Pipe, Cylinder

Materials of pipes edit

Factual reviewers: Plastic, Steel Tube

This section of the article claims that "... [a]ll pipes are made from plastic ...", which is false and unverifiable. — Steel Tube

I feel that this section fails to provide adequate coverage, especially in regards to varying materials of pipes — plastic, wooden, stone, concrete, steel, and others. — Plastic

Construction of pipes edit

Factual reviewers: Piper, Steel Tube

History of pipes edit

Factual reviewers: Plumber

Footnotes edit

Factual reviewers: Notetaker, Foot

Bibliography edit

Factual reviewers: SeeAlso, Cylinder