Wikipedia:Community enforceable mediation/Tezza1 and The Null Device

The following discussion is an archived record of a Community enforceable mediation. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the page.

Tezza1 (talk · contribs) and The Null Device (talk · contribs) edit

Tezza1, sign here:

The Null Device, Sign here: The Null Device 02:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closed after Tezza1 (talk · contribs) acceptance remained unsigned after 7 days. The Null Device 08:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

Tezza1 has engaged in long-term disruptive editing of Railpage Australia, POV abuse, repeated reverts, agenda pushing, WP:POINT and listing an article for speedy deletion immediately after it was unprotected. Evidence and endorsements are shown in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tezza1. The Null Device 02:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond to this latter in detail, but I find it amusing that this individual has jumped in at a very late stage in this recent incident, just after I submitted the article for peer review and flooded the article with edits[1], while the other supporters of the current article stand back and nod like donkeys. I suspect there has been an blocking strategy which was organized in another discussion forum. This user has never attempted to discuss the matter on my talk page according to guidelines.[2]

   1 Avoidance
   2 First step: Talk to the other parties involved
   3 Second step: Disengage for a while
   4 Further dispute resolution
       4.1 Informal mediation
       4.2 Discuss with third parties

Tezza1 14:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediator acceptance edit

WP:RFCU in progress; inappropriate for this venue. Durova^Charge! 03:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - WP:RFCU is closed. The Null Device 01:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.