Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 June 29

< June 28	June 30 >

June 29

Category:Wealthfare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 6 July 2005 16:35 (UTC)

Neologism - and superfluous synonym for well-established term corporate welfare. Category could be renamed appropriately, but I'm not sure we need such a category at all. I don't mind as long we get rid of the pointless neologism. Rd232 29 June 2005 07:33 (UTC)

Delete: (alternatively rename and make NPOV) The whole category seems terrebly POV: "To be listed here, there must be evidence of actual subsides being offered to a corporate entity so that it can crush honest hard-working competitors by government fiat." Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If someone wants to make a NPOV compilation of corporations who recieve subsidies a List of corporations recieving government subsidies (in XXX country) type article would be a much better medium anyway, in a category you can't supply "proof" on a case by case basis to make it verifiable enough (IMHO). --Sherool 29 June 2005 12:40 (UTC)
Delete silly, neologistic, POV category. Do not merge into the above suggestions until someone comes along and decides they have the evidence to construct the cat. -Splash June 29, 2005 19:12 (UTC)
Delete. Inherently POV. · Katefan0^(scribble) June 29, 2005 19:54 (UTC)
Delete. --Kbdank71 29 June 2005 20:15 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.