Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TheMagikBOT 4

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

TheMagikBOT 4

Operator: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 10:08, Thursday, June 29, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: On request

Function overview: Article importance assessment. Gets list of pages from Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand/Assessment/Bot list and places the |importance= parameter into the template according to its importance in the list.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Thailand#Mass_importance_assessment, Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Mass_importance_assessment_for_WikiProject_Thailand

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 4984

Namespace(s): Article talk

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Gets all pages and their importance classification from this list. Add the importance=[high/mid/low] parameter if none exists, or adds the [high/mid/low] if the |importance= exists. If there is an existing |importance=[high/mid/low] parameter the bot skips it.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits or 10 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. OK to trial, please place links to edits below with any results. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete.. Edits either take the form of: [1] adding the parameter or [2] just adding the importance. All edits were from the 'high' importance list. Link to all contribs [3]. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 13:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.