Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MaatyBot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Request Expired.
Operator: AhMedRMaaty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:01, Tuesday October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: pywikipedia
Function overview: interwiki adding
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): daily
Estimated number of pages affected: approx. 50/week
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes, at home wiki (Arabic)
Function details:
Discussion edit
- Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Two questions: which interwiki options are being used, and why is it already editing? Rcsprinter (post) @ 13:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- These edits are just trial, a bot must be tested before request as I know ^_^ --AhMedRMaaty (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you have it the wrong way round - bots are tested in a trial when approved to do so during a request, not before. Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 00:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- oh,really ?! sorry for that. so what should I do now? --AhMedRMaaty (talk) 00:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You could answer my first question, which options are you using with the script? Rcsprinter (lecture) @ 00:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I use no options, only the script --AhMedRMaaty (talk) 00:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
Any updates to questions? MBisanz talk 14:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.