Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/KasparBot 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

KasparBot 2

Operator: T.seppelt (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 06:38, Saturday, May 9, 2015 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Java

Source code available:

Function overview: The bot will add {{Authority control}} to all pages on this list. The query matches articles with no {{Authority control}} but AC information at the corresponding Wikidata item.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:Authority control#Next steps, User talk:Multichill#Authority control

Edit period(s): one time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 165,133 (see [1])

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes

Function details: The bot will add {{Authority control}} to all articles on that list (see [2]). The template will placed above {{Persondata}} and or the articles doesn't embed {{Persondata}} above the first category.

Discussion

Great!. Multichill (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sladen, Pigsonthewing -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. some examples: [3], [4], [5]. I didn't notice any problems. Regards, --T.seppelt (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@T.seppelt: Good - and important - work; thank you. Once complete a (say) monthly clean-up job may be useful. I generally put {{Authority control}} above navboxes, BTW, on the principle "things about the subject" before "other things to see". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: I get your point, but shouldn't we follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout? After approval I will implement such a periodic task. Thanks, -- T.seppelt 15:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of a member of the Bot Approvals Group. Once assistance has been rendered, please deactivate this tag by replacing it with {{t|BAG assistance needed}}. -- T.seppelt (talk) 06:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Magioladitis (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.