Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Adithyakbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

Adithyakbot

Operator: Adithyak1997 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 17:46, Thursday, January 31, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: supervised

Programming language(s):

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: To correct the errors that are stated in the category CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Daily once until all the pages in the category are removed

Estimated number of pages affected: Around 5400 to 5500

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: I am planning to make changes in the following method:
1)Generate the list of pages by typing the category name.
2)Using find and replace option in AWB to replace all the pages where each of the pages will be checked manually after the edit is being made.

Discussion

Note: This request specifies the bot account as the operator. A bot may not operate itself; please update the "Operator" field to indicate the account of the human running this bot. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This bot has edited its own BRFA page. Bot policy states that the bot account is only for edits on approved tasks or trials approved by BAG; the operator must log into their normal account to make any non-bot edits. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Adithyak1997: make 5 of these edits with your own account and list the diffs below as an example of what you are going to do please. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link 5. Do you mean this way?Adithyak1997 (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) None of those edits were correct. |editor1= should not contain the name of more than one editor. See my corrections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89:Sorry for the errors caused. Actually I was not aware of the fact that changing the parameter from |editors= to |editor1= leads to another maintenance category. Now, since it requires the use of regex, I am removing my request.Adithyak1997 (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by operator. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.