Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2022/11


Kerosene edit


  Kerosene – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,293 daily hits

  • Of high practical importance. Sufficient content is already present but major parts (especially Applications) need to be organized and trimmed. Lede needs a more balanced summary of the article. History section is much in need of trimming. Out-of-date and low-quality references need replacement. The B class rating is 8 years old. Some parts are technical but most are readily improved by interested non-experts. –MadeOfAtoms (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, as per above. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - article could need projects help.BabbaQ (talk) 22:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Mashed potato edit


  Mashed potato – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 303 daily hits

  • Vital article with broad interest that happens to be a stub (although maybe it's more of a start?) and has decent pageviews. I think this nom basically meets all the TAFI criteria. Clovermoss (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Cuisine edit


  Cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 488 daily hits

  • Vital article 4, Start Article in need of improvement,Top importance in Food and Drink and >200 daily views. Danubeball (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, needs expansion. SVcode(Talk) 15:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per SVcode. Clovermoss (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as above, but also everyone eats and so topic might draw a diverse group of editors of all levels together. happy happy — LumonRedacts 04:16, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Criticism of monarchy edit


  Criticism of monarchy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 502 daily hits

  • This article, though not quite short, actually is no comprehensive since it lacks info about criticisms in Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Denmark, and criticisms in the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Thailand are not summarized, although it does provide internal links to let readers know them.--RekishiEJ (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support – Yes, particularly like the global scope of this one. Important political topic. — LumonRedacts 14:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, as per above. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - per above as well.BabbaQ (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Sankebetsu brown bear incident edit


  Sankebetsu brown bear incident – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 274 daily hits

  • Article has had multiple maintenance tags for 5 years now without much improvement. It lacks adequate sources for the majority of its main body, and the tone isn't appropriate for wikipedia. - ThatSpiderByte (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, has enough hits and needs improvement.SVcode(Talk) 00:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, as per above. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Enough hits. Project can help.BabbaQ (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Tricolour (flag) edit


  Tricolour (flag) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 249 daily hits

  • Includes so many flags from around the world. Tagged for nearly a decade. 1 citation (a dictionary definition). Paraguay, Mexico, India, Ivory Coast, should be great for international collaboration. Gaois (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Passes everything except for Importance. Danubeball (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Maid edit


  Maid – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 235 daily hits

  • Tagged for more than seven years. Very few citations. Mid-importance at the relevant history WikiProject. Gaois (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support – as above, but also because the Asia/Middle East section needs expansion to bring the topic to the 21st century. — LumonRedacts 14:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - needs project help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Poet edit


  Poet – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 374 daily hits

  • Only eight citations at this time. Top importance at both its active WikiProjects. Gaois (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Gaois' statements. Sportsfangnome (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Yes, this is silly. Where has WikiProject Poetry been at this whole time. Pretty vital. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support:, as per above and have multitrouted the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry with this diff. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, important article that could use expansion and more sourcing. SVcode(Talk) 22:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Goalkeeper edit


  Goalkeeper – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,033 daily hits

  • Surprisingly poor considering it is a position shared by so many sports. Tagged for more than seven years as needing citations. Only five references. The sports involved are played throughout the world (so more important than sport-specific positions such as quarterback or slip) and easier for people from different backgrounds to collaborate on. Gaois (talk) 23:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Although it has a whole lot of information, it doesn't have any citations like you said, there can possibly be enough information to make it at least a B article, the best I see it as is a featured article, it should be nominated. Sportsfangnome (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Per Sportsfan.Danubeball (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per AFI. SVcode(Talk) 23:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of film edit


  History of film – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 819 daily hits

  • Hello Wikepedians! I come to you again after suggesting food court a few years back to suggest another Vital Article, this time a Level 3. This page has been a labor of love of mine for the last 2 years or so. The project for me started as I noticed the page was lacking incredibly in citations and content and I've finally gotten the early decades of film (1890s through very early 1910s) on the page to a standard that I see as somewhat acceptable with the help of a few others, namely @Joortje1. With that being said, the rest of the page is severely in need of help. A few years back, the page was split into the history of film technology and the history of film as an artistic medium. I am seeking help for this page on the history of the medium. Windyshadow32 (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Suppport, several sections without citations and needs copyedit. SVcode(Talk) 22:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per above.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per above. Danubeball (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 22:43, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]