Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2019/6

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement‎ | Nominations‎ | Archives


Visoko during the Middle Ages edit

  Visoko during the Middle Ages – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5 daily hits

  • I would really like for somebody who is native English speaker to take a look at this article that I created. I really want to make good article about it. I would be grateful for any help. Thanks! Mhare (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charcoal (art) edit

  Charcoal (art) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 113 daily hits

Charcoal is an art material used in a lot of artwork. I think that the article has the potential to be expanded (especially in the history section) and could generally be improved. Clovermoss (talk) 15:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 20:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as above. Masum Reza📞 22:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World edit

  World – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1577 daily hits

  • Highly important article in several fields, yet only a start-class one. Overall very short for a subject that so much can be written about (quite meager compared to Earth, for instance). Geolodus (talk) 12:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as an extremely important article with room for improvement. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chorale edit

  Chorale – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 106 daily hits

  • A level 5 vital article with two sections that need expanding and an empty section) Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Comment and maybe it's just me, but the article is very confusing to read Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of the United States edit

  Culture of the United States – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1228 daily hits

  • (Not sure if Geography is the most fitting place to put this) Quite a lot of paragraphs are unsourced or undersourced, poorly written, confusing, essay-like or otherwise problematic. It truly saddens me that a page that gets as many daily views as this one happens to be in such a poor shape. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 21:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as is in poor shape for such an important topic. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


1991 Armenian independence referendum edit

  1991 Armenian independence referendum – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Despite being a significant referendum in the history of Armenia, this article is still a mere stub. RekishiEJ (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. Clovermoss (talk) 03:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2019/6&oldid=989925466"