Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2017/7

Bengali cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Several unsourced sections, including the very long "Characteristics of Bengali cuisine" section. Has high page views. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support- Is a improvable page (Also I am a Bengali) FORCE RADICAL (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. –Davey2010^Talk 00:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - needs sourcing, copyediting, and reorganization. Sumana Harihareswara 19:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(The validity of the figures posted in this page is severely contested. Certain editors have engaged in edit wars to enforce their figure (without proper evidence). Warning, said editors engaged on that article are extremely stubborn and will not see reason when it is clearly explained to them.) Nalipak (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – According to TAFI guidelines, articles should not be targets of controversy – 𝕘wendy | ☎ 15:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - If I've read the nomination correctly they don't actually care about any improvements ... they just care about some figures and in some respects are trying to GAME the system ? ...., Anyway we're here to improve not solve stupid edit wars. –Davey2010^Talk 00:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose-Looks like the editor has mistaken the project as a place similar to WP:3O FORCE RADICAL (talk) 11:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian cheese – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Support - One part agrees it needs improvements on the other side tho I don't think this'll interest many but maybe I'm wrong.... –Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as it can clearly use improvement. Sumana Harihareswara 19:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – a well identified article which is of low quality, from a part of the world disproportionately written about for negative reasons. "Weak" because I'm dubious how easy collaborative improvement will be given a likely lack of English sources, but I've good reason to believe that I'll be proven wrong. StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]