Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/10

C++ – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,387 daily hits

Nominating C++ for being a popular coding language, high page views, and was also a good article once. Article improvement on this could help the article (and TAFI) even more. Redolta📱 ^Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I was on the fence about this one... In the realm of computer science this is definitely an important topic (more than "mid-importance" I think, as it is currently classified), but we should bear in mind the subject is very specialized and many contributors may not understand or be able to contribute to the extent we hope for without a computer science background. Moreover, the article is well developed. Being a computer scientist myself, I am attracted to improving this but I think it may be better to recruit like-minded editors at WP:COMPSCI — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MusikAnimal - If you're a computer genius you're going to love editing this, If you have no idea about the C++ stuff then you're probably not going to edit it atall and chances are MB would be the only person at TAFi to even edit it anyway. –Davey2010^Talk 18:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Rock – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Probably popular to those in the 1970-1980s era, Unknown to everyone after that (Yup I was born in the 90s yet have never heard of this in my entire life), Due to it being unknown to the younger generation I don't think this would gain much (if any) edits at all. –Davey2010^Talk 18:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Box – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 193 daily hits

Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'Oppose - Article could do with more sources but overall the article looks fine & doesn't really need improving, Personally I think there's better articles we could spend our time on. –Davey2010^Talk 18:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magic 8-Ball – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 892 daily hits

Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - I'm not entirely sure anyone would really edit this but we can give it a blast. –Davey2010^Talk 18:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Still a popular (and real-life) toy among children and also has high page views that a week's effort would be swell. Redolta📱 ^Contribs 17:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Redolta📱 ^Contribs 17:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brasília – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,479 daily hits

Nominating Brasília for being several reaosns. Brasília is the capital of Brazil, incredibly high page views, and, LBH, we can ceratinly bring this important city to at least B-class with effort. Redolta📱 ^Contribs 02:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --CSJJ104 (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm not really seeing the need to improve this as IMHO it looks fine already, Sure it's perhaps a Highly important topics and interest to a few people but I'm just not seeing any improvements needed. –Davey2010^Talk
Oppose Already highly developed — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot ^talk 04:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]