Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/7

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement‎ | Nominations‎ | Archives

Faraday cage edit

  Faraday cage – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1000+ daily hits

  • So many hits on this, and so little sourcing on it. Mid-importance on physics. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - it seems pretty complete, other than the citations. This WikiProject appears to suit best with improved content, not really the citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 04:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose-- Reasons above and only mid importance. Rubbish computer 11:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - Reasons above. Rayukk (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - Ah, I feel a feeling that the content is complete. Content improvement is most important in this WikiProject, not necessarily the citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. Everyone appears to disagree with improving that article. All right. Since ClueBot III is shut down at the moment, I will have to do that dirty work. Huh. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goat meat edit

  Goat meat – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 200+ daily hits

  • Goat meat is claimed to be far better in taste than pork, beef, lamb(sheep), chicken, fish or any other eatable living creature. Many people say that "I don't like goat meat" just because they can't afford goat meat as price of goat meat is far higher than other meats. Read this complete Washington post article Goat Meat- The Final Frontier -Washington Post, even they claim that nutritionwise and tastewise "Goat meat" is best among all. They described Goat meat as "Higher Price, Superior Product", so article of this superior product should be superior, we should spread awareness among all carnivorous people. If you hate goat meat then read this New York Times article How I Learned to Love Goat Meat -The New York Times --Human3015 knock knock • 14:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support because of the page views, I have no opinion on whether goat meat is good or bad to eat. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. An article about a staple food in several countries that can be improved. North America1000 14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - because of the page views, and also the need to put more information about the information about goat meat production. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tandoori Chicken edit

  Tandoori chicken – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 300+ daily hits

  1. Support - but that is only the high number of views per day. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 20:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Rubbish computer 00:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --Human3015 knock knock • 07:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mechanic edit

  Mechanic – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Way too small. P.S., I changed your nomination look. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support --Human3015 knock knock • 22:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support--In addition to the above points it is unreferenced. Rubbish computer 10:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved. North America1000 10:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken nugget edit

  Chicken nugget – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - An average of 150 to 300 daily hits

 
Two chicken nuggets
  1. Support – Easily expandable and receives lots of page hits (5,754 times in the last 30 days, as of this post). North America1000 10:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Important food item and easily expandable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3.Support: A highly influential food item. I won't chicken out of supporting this one. Rubbish computer 00:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Approved Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/7&oldid=1078232978"