Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Vicente Vicente
Case Filed On: 07:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
- List of Ohio State University people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)====
semi-protect. Repeated inaccurate postings. Vicente Vicente 07:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Questions:
editHave you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yes
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: Repeated inaccurate postings
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: I requested assistance once before, but am unfamiliar with how the system works. I do not even know how to reply to mail!
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: hopefully the page can reflect accurate information. Those who insist on degrading it will hopefully quit.
Summary:
editDiscussion:
editHi, Vicente. i will be your advocate. Geo. 01:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Wslack already has responded. Geo. 22:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Followup:
editWhen the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
editCase Status: open
Advocate Status: