Zv92

Image copyright problem with Image:Mfaclogo.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mfaclogo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Citation formatting

Per the Manual of Style, citation formats in articles should not be arbitrarily changed, as you did with this edit to Sydney, which completely rewrote the article. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Citations in Sydney

Please stop changing the dates of the citation in the infobox at Sydney. The dates as they stand are correct. Citation dates should be as specific as possible and changing them from specific dates to "2014" is unhelpful. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

You appear to be engaged in an edit war with another editor according to your reverts at Sydney. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

You and Luxure need to discuss this on the article's talk page and come to a consensus. AussieLegend (✉) 10:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)