Well, first of all, let's say it correctly. It's "SovereignIST," not "SovereignTIST," but that is a minor quibble.
I don't even know how this article is being allowed to stay up, as it's so badly written that it sounds like the result of some high-school kid's rushed homework project, not an article for the premier online encyclopedia, Wikipedia. It's just atrociously badly written.
In addition, some phrases like "Some say . . . " have no place in an article dealing with *facts.* Really, do "some say" whatever it is that you say they say? Well, I can boldly tell you that "others say" completely the opposite.
That's just one example; my point is that this article needs to be taken away by a competent editor and rewritten, preferably in college-level English, not high-school level, and written to cover known facts,* not conjecture from a faceless "they" who exist only in the writer's overheated imagination.