First Comments

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Zimriel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  SouthernComfort 1 July 2005 22:26 (UTC)

Your welcome

edit

Hi. No one "controls" Wikipedia articles, so feel free to be bold in editing as many articles as you are interested in! Most especially in the area of Near Eastern ancient history, we need more good editors who have knowledge of this subject. I haven't had time as of late to read up further on the history of Nestorians in Khuzestan (often neglected in the major texts), so please expand this area further if you are interested. As a side note, you may want to organize and format the data (which you have greatly expanded) in Basra and Kufa into sections with relevant headers. I'll try to do this myself if you don't have time (or as often happens, someone else will get to it!). At any rate, welcome again, and I hope you decide to stay here and contribute further. Take care, SouthernComfort 2 July 2005 23:30 (UTC)


Bronze Age

edit

Sapinuwa

edit

Your new article Sapinuwa is more extensive, so I only added the category Archaeological sites in Turkey. Maybe a separate subcategory called Hittite sites in Turkey or the like could be created within this? --JFK 10:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hayasa

edit

Thanks for your insightful contirbutions to the Hayasa-Azzi article. Cheers.--Eupator 14:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

3000 BP

edit

Dear Sir or Madam, For volcanic eruptions, some scientists date such events using the term 3000 BP or 2900 BP. What does 3000 BP mean--is it 3,000 years ago (ie. 1000 BC) or 3000 BC? How about 2900 BP. I'm referring to the Hekla III event.

  • PS: Is it certain now that the Hekla III eruption has been redated to 1000 BC (I think) and not 1159 BC--they seem more distant. I did not know of this new research. I hope it is from a reliable source and not a fringe one. From the sources you gave in, they seem bona fide and reliable. Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am not a vulcanologist. I am however able to sniff out bunk, and its stench exudes from any article which claims a specific year for a given Bronze Age event (possible exception granted to Mursili's Eclipse). Looking into Hekla III, I found a dispute between Baker and Dugmore, both peer-reviewed scientists (so I'm not willing to declare either of them as "fringe"). As far as I know their tiff hasn't been resolved, although Icelandic scholars seem to favour Dugmore.
I will say that anyone who puts Hekla III into an article about Rameses III at this time is fringe. --Zimriel (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Late Antiquity

edit

Chronicle of Ireland

edit

Great stuff, thanks! Dppowell 20:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject France

edit

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject France

edit
 
Welcome Zimriel, to the WikiProject France! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on France-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject France}}.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.
  Wikipedia:France-related tasks
vieweditdiscusshistorywatch

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!

STTW (talk) 21:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Procolophonoid or Procolophonid

edit

Hello Zimriel, Thank you for your efforts on improving wikipedia articles. Please, read the note I left on the Procolophonoid talk page. Thank you ArthurWeasley 21:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Museum of Anatolian Civilizations

edit

You'll probably be glad to know that I'm in the process of uploading to the Commons lots of photos I recently made in this museum in Ankara, while touring through Turkey Commons:Category:Museum of Anatolian Civilizations. I'm planning to add (on a later date) some additional text in the WP, based on the book "The Hattian and Hittite Civilizations" by the famous Turkish archaeologist Ekrem Akurgal that I bought in that museum. This book contains very detailed first-hand information about those civilizations, based on a whole life of research. I'm not an archaeologist and I hope that you'll watch my future contributions with eagle eyes. JoJan 19:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  WikiProject Newsletter n°1

edit

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, ChrisDHDR (17:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).Reply

WikiProject France newsletter

edit
WikiProject France News

What's new?

edit
  •   The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
  • The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
  • A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
  • There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.
User-related news

Notifications

edit
Complete project tasks
Overview

This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Articles
  • Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews:
  1. Louvre Abu Dhabi
  2. Louvre
  3. Family Moving Day
  4. Napoleon I
  5. List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes
  •   Two articles have reached GA status this month:
Newsletter contributors

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 17:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Book of Tang

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Book of Tang, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article has only been edited twice in two years and has no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. gordonrox24 (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Islam

edit

Re: al-Hasan al-Basri

edit

Hey, I replied to your comments over there. There are no hard feelings, though my views on the structure of the section differ a bit. There really isn't any significance to this comment though I find that a polite introduction helps things run more smoothly. Let's just work this out as fast as possible. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


Isho`yahb II

edit

You did actually spend some time comparing the two versions of the Ishoyahb II article, yes? --Zimriel (talk) 03:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Zimriel (talk),

Sorry if I was hasty. I seem to have done the same thing as you, and inadvertently taken out stuff that could usefully have stayed in (especially the material from Guidi's Chronicle). Let me revisit your earlier edit, and take another look at it. I don't agree with all you say, and I don't think we need to labour the point at such length, but I do agree with you that we need to cast doubt on the authenticity of these so-called 'treaties' between the Christians and the Muslims. I am familiar with Chase Robinson's book, and although he is not always right, he is right on that point.

Give me a couple of days, and I will try to come up with a suitable form of words.

Djwilms (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

75 Ceti

edit

Hello! I'm a user from Russian wiki. I write article about star 75 Ceti. And I've found that you added information about Chinese asterism in English version of the article. I tried to read the Chinese site following the link that you added (using Google translator). But there was nothing about 75 Ceti. Could you find me a passage where the star is written about. Sorry for my poor English. -- Marhorr (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ahmadiyya Tafsir

edit

Please Discuss:

Template talk:Tafsir#Non Islamic --User:Sirius86 User talk:Sirius86 22:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sapinuwa

edit

Oh, you're very welcome! Thanks for reaching out; it's always nice to hear that people aren't upset about edits one's made. :-) The bigger problem is less how you cited things (which can always be tidied a little) than link rot, which is an internet-wide problem. You wouldn't happen to remember what "Focus on Ortakoy" referred to by any chance, would you? Q·L·1968 21:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gray wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lycurgus. Such links are almost always unintended, ... DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

In this case, I was linking to the name and not to any specific person with that name. So this was not unintended. --Zimriel (talk) 22:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Zimriel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Zimriel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply