Welcome!

edit

Hello, Zeshan Mahmmod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 00:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Category:Jammu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 03:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your category work

edit

There's been a concern raised about the categories you're creating and the high speed of the creations. Can you please stop (for now) and explain your aims? --NeilN talk to me 04:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions alert

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greater Pakistan (political concept) (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Zeshan Mahmmod, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

categorising image files

edit

Please don't add categories (especially non-existant ones) to image files for files which are from Commons like you did at File:Largest Red Deer.jpg. This just creates a local copy which leads to difficulties if people are linking to the Commons file. Nthep (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

One of the key Wikipedia requirements is to be able to cite reliable sources. Adding categories to bypass the requirement may not be a good idea. We have had past issues with editors adding categories to make a political point which again is not useful for Wikipedia. (see for instance this history). Shyamal (talk) 14:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the creation of categories to promote political ideas on regions could get you blocked. It would be best to discuss it if you think it is legitimate. Shyamal (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked for three hours from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Shyamal (talk) 14:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

Hi, please stop creating and populating categories for imaginary or vaguely proposed provinces. If there're any sources about these provinces, consider instead creating articles about them. Let me know if anything's unclear. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


Again, please stop. Before you make any other edit that's related to categories, please read about how they work at WP:CAT. If you think a proposed province deserves coverage on wikipedia, consider creating an article about it if you can find sources. Then you can list what areas this province will contain. Do not create categories for these province. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Category:Quetta District.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talkcontribs) 20:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 20:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is a collaborative project and not responding to concerns about your editing is not acceptable. Please acknowledge this message or your next block will be an indefinite one. --NeilN talk to me 20:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply