Do you ever notice it's only ever the ones "who wrote the article" that comes to me about removing large chunks of text? Zerocannon (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Rice Burner edit
Hi, I'm the one who put the notability tag on this page so don't assume I'm pro this page, but please don't make major modifications to this article without consulting the talk page. As you'll notice there has been lots of discussion on this. Also, please don't refer to car enthusiasts as petrolheads. Wikipedia is not a place for name calling. What I've learned over my time editing here is that consensus rules over pretty much anything less than a lawsuit. So while you may have had good intentions enforcing the policies, do remember to assume good faith in editing. I hope not to see an edit war should someone decide to revert your edits (although I probably won't) Transcendence (talk) 01:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
DOA edit
Just to let you know, I've undone the damage you did to the DOA: Dead or Alive article. Before you start making such dramatic changes (without having the courtecy of posting anything on that article's talk-page) at least get your facts straight. This is not a straight-to-video film and even if it was the fact that its based on prior source-material automatically gives it some level of worth in comparing its relation to that source-material.
The plot-section has been a problem, removing it altogether is not the solution.
Use your brain next time before you decide to do something like this again.
The Fast and the Furious edit
The solution to a long plot summary is not to remove it entirely. You cut it down. I wrote one out from scratch before finding that you had removed it a few months earlier. I believe my summary is short, concise, and follows the plot summary guidelines. All movie sarticles require a plot summary. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)