Your recent edits. edit

Your edit summary at Jeffrey St. Clair is a personal attack.[1] You appear to be new to Wikipedia, it has specific policies and guidelines which all editors must follow. I will post a welcome message so you can familiarize yourself with them. TFD (talk) 00:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Are you an administrator? How is it a personal attack? The source states what I said on his wikiepdia page. How is that a personal attack? Zerdek (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Your edit summary "Alt-right attacking?" is a personal attack as you are aware. And no, I am not an administrator. TFD (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Then why did you remove sourced content? What was "weasely" about what I said when that's exactly how it is stated in the source? Various women did accuse him of being sexist int he way he ran counterpunch. Nothing was fabricated against St Clair. That's exactly what it states in the sourced article. Zerdek (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
You can discuss the edit on the article's talk page and since you did not reply I have also started a discussion page at the Neutral Point of View Noticeboard.
All editors are authorized to remove material inconsistent with policy, just as you are allowed to add material to articles. I notice you did not reply about the alt-right personal attack you made against me..
TFD (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Zerdek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 00:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Vladimir Putin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~ Rob13Talk 17:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply