ZeehanLin

Welcome!

Hi ZeehanLin! I noticed your contributions to Republic of China and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Certes (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

You should be careful on editing Taiwan topics

You are brand new here and the only articles you have edited are Taiwan-related articles. You have been reverted on Taiwan (disambiguation) twice, and on Republic of China once. Your first post here was opening a discussion at Talk:Taiwan which was closed with "no new arguments" and "talking in circles." Now you open another topic at Talk:Taiwan which goes into the same thing. Perhaps you are unaware on how to read all the archives. Perhaps you don't understand Wikipedia protocols or how consensus works. I'm not sure. There are good editors and administrators who can help you with that.

What I am sure of is that continuing the same arguments on the same single topic does not bode well for your editing privileges down the line. I suggest stepping away from this single topic and finding other articles that bring you joy and editing fun. This can be a great place if you work well with others as a team, and move along when consensus is against you. But obversely, persistent beating a topic over and over can lead to blocks and bad feelings for all. I'd move along for what it's worth. Cheers and happy editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Thx ZeehanLin (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop ignoring the existing RfC consensus and reliable sources cited by other editors. You are free to move on to other topics if you aren't able to understand or productively comment on this specific topic. Butterdiplomat (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I have something to say in the Statement on some of the discussions I have made. ZeehanLin (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

But there is another big problem that you may not realize. You opened a topic... fine. You want a change... fine. And you stated as such... fine. What is not fine is continually adding more to others "oppose" statement. That should really not be done unless they address you personally. Everyone gets their say and there is no need to comment on each one. We know your stance. Administration frowns on that a lot. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

• And again you should be very careful on these one-track edits. I warned you about things back in February that all you are doing is editing Taiwan related articles and getting reverted. Then going to Taiwan related talk pages and running discussions into circles. You disappear for five months and reappear suddenly July 26 and what are you editing... Talk:Taiwan, Mainland China (and getting reverted), and creating Draft:Taiwan which has no chance of being implemented. I say once again, this one track approach does not always bode well. We just had an editor blocked indefinitely who was fixated on these topics but they also wouldn't respond to talk page requests (which hasn't occurred here). I'm not saying it has reached that level, but I don't want to see that happen here. So be careful in your approach, don't keep saying the same things and expect a different response, and branch out and find some other topics you'd like to improve. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for your warning.

  In WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS:

  Wikipedia consensus usually occurs implicitly. An edit has presumed consensus until it is disputed or reverted. Should another editor revise that edit, the new edit will have presumed consensus until it meets with disagreement. In this way, the encyclopedia gradually improves over time.

  If the opinions raised are not questioned, then it can be considered a consensus. Therefore, I need to reply to them to express that their opinions are questioned and even partially unreasonable.

  ...creating Draft:Taiwan which has no chance of being implemented...

  Many of you have already preconceived that my changes are wrong and ultimately unworkable. Many of you are not seeking the truth, but are trying to exclude "intrusions" from people like me, whether reasonable or unreasonable. I have always taken this matter seriously, and I have looked for sources to maintain neutrality as much as possible, but you think this is a kind of "sabotage".

  I am very sorry to see such a Wikipedia. ZeehanLin (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)