Zbankozbankovych

August 2011

Me am so smart. Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiny Kox, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vrenator (talk) 15:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

False positive. Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zbankozbankovych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not vandalising anything - I'm telling the truth. Google 'Tiny Kox' and you'll come up with many sites commenting on the hilarity of Kox's name.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 15:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zbankozbankovych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry, I didn't understand that the kind of posting in which I was engaging wasn't appropriate for Wikipedia. I apologise and won't do it again.

Decline reason:

You were warned enough times, I find it hard to believe you didn't realise what you were doing was inappropriate Jac16888 ^Talk 15:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zbankozbankovych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's only when you actually suffer the consequences of your actions that you realise how wrong you were. Please? Waffles for you... Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't see that unblocking you would be a benefit to the project. Obviously the edits you were making were inappropriate; your replacing them with the edit summary "False positive" tells me that you did understand this. You're more or less on your last chance here. Your next appeal needs to be serious, void of lies, and shows a sincere intent to improve the encyclopedia. If you don't think you can do that, I'd suggest finding something else to do. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All you did was vandalize. --Onewhohelps (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't aware that what I was doing was vandalism. I've read the rules, and will not do it again. Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Now you're messing around on your talk page. --Onewhohelps (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Am I not allowed to personalise my talk page? Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Stroopwafels are tasty! Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Beer is tasty! Zbankozbankovych (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Persistent!

Dear Admin,

Is there a way to stop him editing this talk page, because he keeps requesting again and again the unblock, and is being declined again and again.

Regards, -Onewhohelps (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

I just want to show you how serious I am! Zbankozbankovych (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

One who helps, it shouldn't matter to you, I'm not totally sure why you're here anyway. Zbank, no, actually you're just showing us how annoying you are, which isn't helping your case. If things continue talk page access may be revoked, but that will be the decision of an administrator. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Very humbly, then, what's the best way to proceed? Do I just wait and not be active, in the hope that one day my ban might be lifted, or is there any way to show that I'm serious about not doing this again? Zbankozbankovych (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)