Zackaryas

August 2014

Hello, I'm Bubba73. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Stolen and missing moon rocks because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 01:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

By hereby, requested to you to reconsider your decision not to publish my recent contribution to: "Stolen and missing moon rocks" (HOW MANY KILOGRAMS OF MOON ROCKS WERE GIVEV AWAY TO VIP AS PAPERWEIGHT Zackaryas (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[1]? I want to note that his argument "Because it did not Appear constructive." is unethical and contrary to the ideals and principles of Wikipedia for expose the truth for on any personal consideration. I beg you not to delay this matter more to avoid to go to "Dispute Resolution Requests."Zackaryas (talk) 22:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Zackaryas/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Zackaryas/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Zackaryas

A tag has been placed on User:Zackaryas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. INeverCry 05:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Zackaryas (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello! I am Zackaryas. I want to say that I agree with your opinion, regarding my response on Counterfeit rocks (Texas); his reasons agree as set forth in Db-u5. Rarely I find a person ready to hold an intelligent conversation, and also has very high ethicos concepts and self-respect as,to consider the truth above their personal convictions. . Usually when people do not meet these conditions, I do not talk with them and I contact the upper level. All right. I want to ask you that aticulo referring, in which quotes my name is cleared without delay. I argue that the reasons for this are: 1) Mr. Gutheinz, does not meet the necessary knowledge to make these claims. (Although in reality he said otherwise.) 2) This article qualify me as a scammer. This accusation does not have any support; I'm still waiting to be charged for that reason. (Nothing would make me happier.) 3) Therefore, this article attempting to damage my good name. 4) NASA never ordered eBay remove my ad ; even you, can see it in: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apollo-11-Moon-rock-Dust-meteorite-0-02-grams-approx-/191279122486?ssPageName=ADME:L:LCA:US:1123 5) As you can see this whole article is a farce, so, this post meets the conditions for removal, under the "Criteria for redaction" (2). But if what is written there, it can be considered as "mere factual statements ..." then my statements also must be considered in the same way. Best regardsZackaryas (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

As I told you on my talk page, all this is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Please use another website or medium, such as a blog or Facebook. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zackaryas/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Revent^talk 03:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Zackaryas, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reventtalk 03:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

meteowongs

Hi Zackaryas, I'll help you with your article as best I can. First things if fist howerver, I am re-creating your sandboxpage: User:Zackaryas/sandbox and I am dumping all of the text you sent me there. Next I'll try to look into your trials over at Articles For Creation. Were you given any specific feedback there? If you want we can move this discussion to the talk page of your re-created sandbox. Hope to see you there. Ryan shell (talk) 13:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

==First distribution of Apollo 11 lunar rocks.== 

For my lack of experience on working on Wikipedia, I'm being hindered by the user Bubba73 in my attempt to inform the public the truth about what happened with the first lunar rocks brought by the Apollo 11 mission. This information is in from NASA News Release P69-10177 / Sep 12 1969 / Distributed Moon Surface Samples https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/42158.pdf This information is important because it shows the opposite to the NASA's affirmation, when stated "moon rocks to VIP never were give away". Below is the text that I want to add to the page, Stolen and missing Moon rocks.

If you agree with the argument of Mr, Bubba 73, who says that this information is not constructive, I ask you explain why , as Mr. Bubba 73 gives no explanation.

Never know exactly but according to the following document leaked by mistake from NASA could be about 10.22 kilograms. https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/42158.pdf

[NEWSN EW S NATIONAL AER~~OWNAAUSTHIICNSG TAONNDD .SCP.A C2E0 5A DMINISTREASTI ON ((22002) ) 99663e.-46195255FOR RELEASE: IMMEDIATE September 12, 1969 RELEASE NO: 69-130 USS4] MOON SURFACE SAMPLES DISTRIBUTED Distribution of about 18 pounds of Moon rocks and dust to scientific investigators around the world begins today at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Manned Spacecraft Center near Houston, Texas. Lunar samples collected by the Apollo 11 astronauts will go to 106 principal investigators in the United States and 36 in eight other countries for analyses in university, l industrial, and government laboratories. The 4.2 kilograms of fine materials and chips and slices of about 30 rocks totaling 4 kilograms are being distributed for first-generation experiments. This makes up about onethird of the lunar materials returned from man's first lunar landing. Another 15 per cent will be kept as examples of the types of material returned from Tranquility Base, where the Apollo 11 Lunar Module landed July 20. The rest will be held for later scientific experiments, from which a small amount may be available on temporary loan for public display. Since its return in sealed containers on July 25, all the material has been under quarantine in the Lunar Receiving Laboratory at the Manned Spacecraft Center where tests on animal and plant life have shown no bad effects. Release of the samples was approved by the Interagency Committee on Back Contamination, set up to review NASA safeguards against the possibility of contamination of the Earth by alien organisimns brought back from the Moon. Preliminary examinations in the Lunar Receiving Laboratory have disclosed that there are two basic rock types: 1) compacted lunar soil and 2) igneous rocks. The preliminary examination has shown that the rocks have been lying on the lunar surface from 10 -150 million years. The igneous rocks crystallized from 3 - 4 billion years ago. Each of the principal investigators or hi, representative mus't personally accept his sample at the Lunar Receiving Laboratory, and his plans for safeguarding the material must have been approved by Manned Spacecraft Center administrative, scientific, and security offici.als. Of the 8.2 kilograms of samples being distributed, approximately 3 kilograms will be destroyed in the course of the planned experiments; the residues and the remaining 5.1 kilograms will be returned to NASA. Investigators plan to report results of their analyses early next year. The types of investigation carried on by the principal investigators include almost every type of ,measurement that has been made on terrestrial igneous rocks or meteorites. The principal types of measurement are: 1. Measurements of physical properties of r(. Ics and soil. These data will help in understanding optical observations of the Moon from Earth as well as future seismic experiments. Studies of miscroscopic fission tracts and cosmic ray induced tracks will help us understand the radiation history of the Moon. 2. Mineralogy and petrology which include the study of the mineral content of the rocks and compositions of these when the rocks crystallized or were formed on the lunar surface. minerals. These studies will show how much water was present The study will also show how surfaces were eroded by particles. 3. Studies of the chemical composition of the rocks and fines. These studies will determine the concentration of virtually every one of the 92 elements that occur on Earth and in meteorites. Determinations of isotopic compositions of strontium lead, and the rare gas elements (Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) will determine the times of crystallization of the igneous rocks and the times that rocks have laid on the lunar surface. Studies of the rare gases in the soil will also furnish the first data on isotopic compositions of solar materials. 4. Biologists and organic chemists will determine the structures and relative abundances of compounds of carbon indigenous in, and deposited on, the lunar surface; determine the origin of the indigenous carbon compounds; catalog microstructures in terms of organized elements and microfossils; and define the presence or absence of viable lunar organisms. (...more)

"But then, where are this 11,22 kilograms that are missing, because the Apollo 11 brought 21,7 kilograms of samples.

(7,23 approx 1/3 were distributed.

3,25      "         15% were kept

11,22 ... paperweights for the desk of VIPs (are missing ? ) 21,70 Total returned.

Seems that NASA forgot this document in his book: "Where No Man Has Gone Before" A History of Apollo Lunar Exploration Missions. By W. David Compton. Published as NASA Special Publication - 4214 in the NASA History Series, 1989

Moreover,the statements of these two officials of the State Department is very clear: "NASA turned over he samples to the State Department to distribute," said Jennifer Ross-Nazal, a NASA historian, in a e-mailed response to question. "We don't have any records about when and to whom the rocks were given." "The office of the Historian does not keep records what become of the moon rocks, and to my knowledge, there is no one entity that does so." (e-mailed Tiffany Hamelin, the State Department Historian.) See: http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/2861027/Apollo-moon-rocks-missing.

Even more,NASA has never said from where the Good-will Apollo 11 moon rock displays came from. (Wikipedia)

moonrocks

Hello again, I've been looking into your recent edits over at Stolen and missing moon rocks and i think it is probably best if you let the current version stand, at least for now. The edits regarding the possible fakes in Texas don't really add a whole lot to the entry, if anything they just confirm what was previously stated- and you may have a conflict of interest - see WP:COI- which is just not worth dealing with. In regards with the moon rock related stuff on my talk page i suggest you hold on to it for now: I think we can turn your sandbox into a potentially useful article with some work and during that process you will learn enough about article creation here that your edits to SaMMR will fit in better. I am going to begin some work on your sand box directly now, feel free to follow me there, or use my talk page, as usual. Ryan shell (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Recess

If you think taking a recess is a good idea, then i support it. Tell me when you want to edit again and I'll be there to help you along. Ryan shell (talk) 14:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)