ZYXW9876

Notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Acroterion (talk) 17:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

• You must not erase active block notices. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

does Wikipedia have an instruction on how to delete your account?

Can't be done. See Wikipedia:Username policy#Deleting and merging accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

this is your last warning - don't revert the truth

You might want to see WP:TRUTH. You might also want to try to be less aggressive towards other users. Many thanks. James^x12345 16:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ZYXW9876. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 16:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ZYXW9876. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 16:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your work

ZYXW9876, you seem to be a SPA (single purpose account) and only want to edit one article, the one on Slavery. Since this has led to blocks and disputes, are there any other areas of Wikipedia where you think you could make a contribution? There are over 4 million other articles to choose from! Of course, all of them require that you properly cite any claims that you make. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Slavery

I have reverted your re-addition. The origin of the word 'slav' in the Slavic languages is very far afield from the point in the Slavery article. Please discuss this on the Talk page, not on my user talk page. --Macrakis (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Please use the article Talk page for this discussion. The consensus there is clearly against including the ultimate etymology of the ethnonym 'Slav', as it is not relevant to the article. You have already been blocked once for your behavior on the article, and if you continue, you will no doubt be blocked again, and perhaps even banned from Wikipedia. --Macrakis (talk) 14:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

You've already broken WP:3RR. You need to get consensus on the talk page for your change. There is none. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Who are you to block me? Do you have that power or are you trying to make me submit to your bullying? I look at the top and it clearly states, "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable". None of that racism is verifiable.

cool reasons I found online why people think Wikipedia sucks - lol

Eddie answered 3 years ago

There are so many, many reasons for this. To be concise, I will limit myself here to ten top reasons:

1) Except for a handful of protected articles, editing of articles on Wikipedia is open and instant. This means that any troll, vandal, fanboi, spammer, propagandist, revenge-seeker, political hack, conspiracy theorist, tinfoil-hatted nutter, narcissist, power-tripper or libeler can add their "improvements" to it. 

2) Wikipedia's central "Neutral Point of View" policy ("NPOV") is fundamentally illogical and has nothing to do with what the rest of the world understands as "neutrality". As a result, "NPOV" means whatever the admin putting the boot in on you says it means. It is the most gamed rule on Wikipedia. 

3) Anonymous editing, a thing strongly protected on Wikipedia, encourages people to be abusive and irresponsible toward others. Wikipedia is basically Usenet 2.0.

4) Despite continuing lame attempts to get more experts to participate, Wikipedia has always harbored a culture that is very hostile to experts. The opinion of a Teenage Mutant Wiki Admin means far more than that of an expert would has studied the subject for decades.

5) Wikiality (wikispeak: "consensus"), the process by which truthiness is determined. Like so many other common words used on Wikipedia, "consensus" does not bear even a passing resemblance to its meaning in the dictionary. 

6) Wikipedia exploits the mentally ill and those with addictive personalities without pity or scruple. It is an unhappy and unhelpful place for such people. 

7) Wikipedia's badly designed and vaguely defined system of governance resembles a primitive feudal system. Wikipedia is essentially run by online warlords. 

8) Wikipedia serves as a convenient platform revenge and defamation, and it has often been exploited by unscrupulous people for just that purpose. 

9) Drama, drama, drama! 

10) Last, but certainly not least, wikipediots. That is, wiki zealots who are quite convinced that Wikipedia has already achieved a state of near perfection, and who respond with hostility and derision to any serious criticism of Wikipedia, or to any serious reform proposal. Wikipediots also have a strong tendency to be confused by facts. Accordingly, attempting to reason with them is inadvisable.

LOL

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Acroterion (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)