Welcome!

edit

Hello, ZIKZU, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Anton Mazurov, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dennis Brown - 02:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Anton Mazurov

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Anton Mazurov has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://antidote-sales.biz/anton-mazurov. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Dennis Brown - 02:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Do not copy/paste information from other websites, that is copyright infringement, and you will be blocked for doing it repeatedly. Dennis Brown - 02:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I understood the claim. Can you restore the draft so that I can change the phrasing? ZIKZU (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    No, because the article is a copyright infringement, so that would have me as a party to breaking the law. You know where you got the information from, since the deleted article was just a copy/paste, you should have access to basic info. Please note, that just modifying a few words and phrases will not be enough. Copyright infringing doesn't just mean direct copies, it also includes close paraphrasing, so the prose must be 100% original. If you aren't up to the task, then don't attempt it. Dennis Brown - 03:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Okay. This is understandable. But in addition to copying, I did the work with the translation of the list of lecture titles, and also provided links to third-party resources. I would like not to repeat the part that I have already worked on. You could partially restore the article or transfer the material to me in some other way. Just so that I don't do it again. I understood about the wording and composition of the text. I will formulate my new biography text. ZIKZU (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply