Yvonne1212

Hi there! I am leaving you a message! (Damatucci (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Yvonne1212, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am Man Zhu, you could call me Grace!

Wiki Peer Review by Barrie

Hi Yvonne,

Your revisions are very strong. You added a considerable amount to the introduction/ definition. I love that you incorporate links to other wikipedia pages. That is a great use of the medium and I'm definitely going to do the same for my page. Great diagram. You have two sub header within your Onion metaphor section: Breadth & Relationship between Depth and Breath. Consider making these two sections subheadings instead of bullets. You also might want to make the criticism section into a paragraph instead of bullets. I just want you to know that a new user came in this morning and edited a considerable amount on your page. You should consider engaging with this person! Might be interesting to understand the ways you differ in opinion. Great start!

BarrieMichelle (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)BarrieBarrieMichelle (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Yvonne1212! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

peer review

Junya, I think this is a good page overall. It would be better if you can add more internal links to the article.

Ailin7 (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review DR

Hi, I think this page is pretty well developed. A few ideas for edits:

• Create a History and Theory section and explain them more
• I think that new media is discussed to a good degree on the page. Perhaps you could pull in more examples from your literature search to add to the robustness of this page
• Find and discuss a counterexample of this theory
• Include the fields of interest (like Barrie has on her Diffusion of Innovation Page)
• More internal links!

I hope this is helpful! Wikisyzygy (talk) 12:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 15:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Little Moon Moon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Little Moon Moon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)