Yscambridge

Welcome!

Hello, Yscambridge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rosena Allin-Khan has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Joseph2302 (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Rosena Allin-Khan

Reply:I have already quoted a signed declaration from Allin Khan herself that she lives in SW12 9QR. Allin Khan herself is the source, she lives in a Batterea address. She is saying something contrary to her own legal declaration.

Labour Party Allin-Khan, Rosena Chantelle - Top Floor Flat, 23 Sistova Road, SW12 9QR (Wandsworth-Balham ward) Anderson, Fleur - 35 Ritherdon Road, SW17 8QE (Wandworth-Bedford ward) - forum member since 23.7.13 Parker, Sophia Elizabeth - 27 Gateside Road, London, SW17 7NB (Wandsworth-Tooting ward) - forum member since 5.2.14

In order to change Rosena Allin-Khan to say she lives in Battersea and not Tooting, you need to provide reliable sources, that refer to her as living in Battersea. Reliable sources such as this and this say she lives in Tooting, so that's what the article should say unless you can find and reference sources that say otherwise. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Are you contesting Allin Khan 's signed declaration ? Her declaration is for public inspection at the electoral office . You refused to read the most reliable sources . I have two off s both with her declaring her address as in Battersea . You are obsessed with abusing yous status not with legal truth . Ism an auditor and I am only interested in the legal truth onot typos . Yscambridge (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I have copy and paste the evidence ( notice issued by the electoral office ) on your talk page . I wish to put on record that you have deleted that legal source and banned me from posting more . I am an auditor and well trained to detect anyone who destroy evidence that they know something is wrong but refuse to correct the mistake . The way for people who abuse their power is to delete the legal and governmental information they know but refuse to act on the matter . You have deleted the source sent in the exact wording of the electoral official and then claim you don't know and banned me from giving that information again . As an auditor , I am used to this sort of cover up by officials given minor powers . Refused to correct something that is wrong , delete the fact they have been sent the government source word for word , prevent receipt of duplicates . Protecting the public from abuse of power is mmy job . Destroying correspondence which indicates you have already receive the source then sealing the letterbox is what you are doing . I repeat you have received the text of the notice from the electoral office deleted it , stpopped duplicates from arriving then misclaimed I havme not given any sources . Yscambridge (talk) 11:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Rosena Allin-Khan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Once again, find reliable sources that say she lives in Battersea- saying "her postcode is Battersea" is original research, which isn't permitted. Reliable sources say she's from Tooting, so that's what the article should say. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Yscambridge reported by User:Joseph2302 (Result: ). Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Battersea or Tooting

Please read reliable sources for what Wikipedia uses as a reliable source of information. Newspaper articles from reputable newspapers like The Guardian are considered reliable sources, and they say she lives in Tooting.

Repeatedly quoting a postcode that is alledgedly in Battersea, is not a reliable source, especially when you don't reference the postcode so that others can actually verify the source.

Once again, unless reliable sources (as defined by Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources) say she lives in Battersea, then this should not be changed. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I've started a discussion at Talk:Rosena Allin-Khan, to get other people's views on the issue. Stop reverting, and start discussing. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...

Yscambridge (talk) 10:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC) SW12 9QR Evidence that Allin-Khan legally signed a declaration she lives in Battersea NOT Tooting.

Page 1 Wednesday 14 May 2014 Paul Martin Town Hall, Wandsworth High Street, London, SW18 2PU Local Returning Officer EPC7-2014 Printed and published by the Local Returning Officer, Town Hall, Wandsworth High Street, London, SW18 2PU NOTICE OF POLL LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH ELECTION OF BOROUGH COUNCILLORS BEDFORD WARD 1. A poll will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014 between 7am and 10pm in this ward. 2. Three councillors are to be elected in this ward. 3. The following people stand nominated in this ward. Candidate Name Address of Candidate Description Names of Proposers(+) Seconders(++) & Assenters ALLIN-KHAN Rosena Chantelle Top Floor Flat, 23 Sistova Road, London, SW12 9QR

You should discuss that at Talk:Rosena Allin-Khan, the article's talk page. That said, I donÄt see where that declaration (where was it originally published?) says anything about the Battersea vs. Tooting question; it does not even mention either. Huon (talk) 11:51, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Too far

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You are also indefinitely banned from my talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Talk:Rosena Allin-Khan‎ could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

What legal action? Joseph asked for sources , I copied and posted the part of electoral office records and he deleted the source . Then claim no source while sealing his letterbox. prevent duplicates being sent . I get the impression that Joseph does not want other people to know that I have governmental sources . Including one signed by Allin Khan . Any lies on that declaration will result in criminal prove curios . Joseph deleted the sources and accused me of not giving any sources . With due respect , Joseph falling accused me of smear . How can anyone be smeared by their legal declaration witnessed by ten people . Joseph should reflect on the fact that I m an auditor trained to protect the public , not engaging in smears as none can be smeared by a document she signed . Allin Khan signed st least two documents confirming addresses in Battersea not Tooting . Respectfully , I ask Joseph to accept the obvious fact that no one can be smeared by at least two documents subject to criminal prosecution if what she says on them is wrong . Please reinstate the text of the legal source I posted on Joseph page. . He asked for the evidence , I sent it , he deleted the evidence the mislead lot hers that I have not given anything to him. He has used his senior status to delete evidence sent to him , sealed his letterbox accused me of giving no evidence . That is an abuse of power against someone who thus far has only used governmental sources and signed declarations from Allin Khan . Yscambridge (talk) 12:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I wish to let ZJoseph know that no matter how many times he tries to close his ears , the truth according to Allin Khan herself is not smear on her . She has legally declared she lives in Battersea I'm 2014 , 2015 and a few days ago in her application to be on the ballot . The fact that her address is in Battersea I has been legally confirmed . I can tell this senior contributor fifty times and he still refuse to accept that he should not have deeted my honest contribution based on legal and governmental sources . How many times does he need to have things explained to him . If the Patliament says Allin Khan has a Battersea address , I cannot change it neither should he deleting the fact he has been sent word for word the text . It is disappointing that information based on the parliamentary and electoral offices have been deleted by a senior contributor . Needless to say , the truth is being held by government departments . Why did ZJoseph obsessed with deleting government information sent to him and deleting entries based on legal declarations ?? It is very puzzling a senior contributor behaves like that . I am willing to accept that he has an error of judgement and temporarily forget that legal and parliamentary sources are supreme . Yscambridge (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I wish to make it cleared that no one can be smeared by information which they have legally signed . Allin Khan provide an address which is not in Tooting on more than one occasion . It is unjustified for Joseph to accuse an auditor of smear when all was done is keep repeating the truth till the public know and no longer rely on unofficial sources which carry no legal weight . Yscambridge (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

No matter how many times I have to repeat it , and Joseph blocking evidence , the legal documents will be there unlike Joseph blocking me indefinitely . Joseph page is not where the evidence can be seen as sealed his letterbox wt. anyone who wants to see evidence cannot find that in my page neither . Joseph abused his status and deleted my page . I rest my case with governmental and parliamentary sources . Th I have to keep repeating that as there are people who abuse their status by deleting evidence sent to them . I am not bothered as it is part of my auditor's training . Use documents witnessed and signed and you will find that Allin Khan considers her address to be in Battersea !!!! IShe cannot be smeared by something she signed . She cannot be smeared by information about 'Tudor' as she gave an interview that Tudor is the 'brain' . We need to know about this brain .AllinKhan put her family especially her husband in full view to support her profile . Yscambridge (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I believe Joseph has gone too far in his attempt to delete information provided by Allin Khan herself . My constant repetition is to protect the public and make sure the right information is in the entry , Yscambridge (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I didn't block you, it requires an administrator to do, which I am not. Also, once again, Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation are not subordinates of the British (or any other) Government, and so official Government sources are not the only sources used. Other reliable sources suggest she's from Tooting.

It's clear you're only here to "expose the lie that she's from Tooting", so it's a good thing you're blocked. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I am less bothered with typos then the truth being deleted and duplicated evidence cannot be resent to the person who asked for them . Anyone who complains of repetition is not interested in correcting info so the truth can be represented . It is extraordinary that Allin Khsn signed documents her address is in Battersea , that reflected in amendments and Jostph keep deleting them and send ppl who told the truth notices and warnings !!! I am used to ppl destroying evidence and blocking the letterbox so no duplicate can be sent . BNo worries , all part of an auditor's training . I ask Joseph not to delete evidence I sent him . Truth cannot be blocked by one person especially Allin Khan 's declaration of a Battersea address is on a notice board . Regards Yscambridge (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to the truth not the typos . Truth must prevail and we all have to learn to repeat them not matter how many times someone in power use their status to delete them to the extent they delete things on you own page !!! I ask people to believe in the official information held by the electoral office and any declaration from Allin Khan which will attract a criminal record if untrue . Yscambridge (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

That is not just government sources . That is her own sources deposited with the government . She told the government that her address is in Battersea . She said that not me !!! I have said , the most reliable source is Allin Khan . S if she lied on that declaration , she gets a criminal record . The source that she has Battersea address is from her 'non and ten witnesses . Y you are refused to accept Allin Khan 's declaration . I am only interested in people believe what people say if they are under the threat of jail if they do not give the correct address .Batttersea is from Allin Khan herself , repeated by ten witnesses who signed her declarations . I am at sea as to why you refused to accept a declaration she made which must be correct or else she and ten people might go jail . The simple fact is sunder the threat of jail , she declared a Battersea address . It is her who give the government that information , Battersea , and it was her who got ten people to sign she is at a Battersea address . Never mind what she says to the journalists as journalists are not guardians of truth , only sometimes Yscambridge (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I am clueless why Joseph used his status to block me . Allin Khan and ten other people might go to jail if her Battersea address is wrong . Why are you still insisting she lives in Tooting when shBattersea is what she declared unlder legal threat of what she writes is not true . I can repeat this , your ears are closed which is rather sad . For the umpteenth time , Allin Khan. herself signed a legal declaration that her address is in Battersea , never mind what you wish or what I think . Threat of crime mal prosecution is sadly sometimes the only way we get the truth from some people. . You must use Allin Khsn as the source . Her declaration is not government source , it is a statutory not newspaper interviews a coffee with starstrucked journalists . Yscambridge (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I say again and again that my source is based on Allin Khan herself and one of the several declarations with a Battersea address is on display . The electoral office has produced what she really claims . Keep telling me to give sources is not going to chandler the truth . Allin Khan signed documents with her Battersea address . You are not going to tell an auditor to give the wrong answer . We trained for a reason , to protect the public . Yscambridge (talk) 13:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I am here to repeat what Allin Khan legally declared for a few years at least . Her address is in Battersea . If the administrator blocked me , why did you not acknowledged the text from the electoral office I sent you . I am reduced to tell you to look at her Battersea address on a notice board !! Yscambridge (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

If you did not block me , whoever did that have delete the text you asked me to send you . And I keep writing non stop to you that you have been given the evidence when you might not have seen it . Thank God our system is still interested in legally displaying Allin Khan's declared address . That address is in Battersea , Sadiq Khan is her Mayor but not her MP . Yscambridge (talk) 13:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Nominated since it includes implied legal threats, and also seeks to attack myself and another editor. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Yscambridge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Claiming that I'm abusing my power is a personal attack. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katie^talk 12:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Oh, and a couple of notes:

1. I didn't block you, like you keep claiming: KrakatoaKatie did.
2. I've already explained many times why the article should say Tooting, and people on the article talkpage agree.
3. You can write as much as you want, I'm not going to bother reading it, as it's the same as every other time I've read it, thus you're wasting your time.
4. If you want to get unblocked, you need to show that you're actually here to contribute positively to the encyclopedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Katie^talk 13:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Yscambridge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #15837 was submitted on May 22, 2016 15:11:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)