User talk:Ylevental/Archive 2

All in a Row Controversy - Alex Oates, Charlie Brooks and Southwark Playhouse

Further to our discussion in Talk:Alex Oates, I have requested consensus on the relevance of having a section about All in a Row in Talk:Southwark Playhouse considering you have been a key editor along with 3 IPs in 3 pages about this controversy since 13 Feb. I'm of the view that this is the best course of action to avoid any edit warring and page vandalism to the above pages while the play is having a performance run. If you are of the view that this play merits a page in its own right, may I suggest that you draft a page for it in your sandbox. Chricon79 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I will look into it tomorrow Ylevental (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Chricon79: Done. See Draft:All in a Row (play) Ylevental (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Ylevental: Thanks. I did spot a tweet on Twitter about the draft and with its URL under the All in a Row hashtag. Are you sure WP:STEALTH is a good idea here? Chricon79 (talk) 13:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Neurodiversity. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Archiving a talk page while discussion is in progress is disruptive. (This archival was then reverted.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Understood, but you should know that some of those people want the entire criticism section deleted, which doesn't make sense at all Ylevental (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Feb. 2019: The" Preview" button is your friend; please don't avoid it!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Let's keep article histories clog-free, and not save our rough drafts there.:>)--Quisqualis (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Content forking

When forking out content from a main article to create a new separate article (as you did for Draft:All in a Row (play) from Alex Oates), please ensure that you read and follow the instructions at WP:Copying within Wikipedia if your new article is heavily based on content from the original. This is important so as to ensure proper attribution and to avoid copyright violations. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All in a Row (play) has been accepted

All in a Row (play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bennv3771 (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

File:All in a Row.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

File:All in a Row Laurence.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Alexander (writer)

The article Benjamin Alexander (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most sources are primary sources, and even the independent sources only give a trivial mention, or are not prominent enough. See WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2606:5580:30C:7F9E:ACE6:B962:17B7:615C (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Autism Speaks Logo Updated.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2001:8003:5901:B400:70A6:8574:2244:C4D3 (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Conflicts of intetest need to be disclosed

Following your acknowledgement of a off-Wikipedia relationship regarding John Mitchell you've yet to add the connected user tag to the Neurodiversity Wikipedia page. As you have edited the section that John Mitchell is named in (criticism) the COI should have been disclosed. Mattevansc3 (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greta Thunberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice on your recent edits to Simon Baron-Cohen

Your recent editing history at Simon Baron-Cohen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

@Nolan Perry: Okay, I will keep that in mind. I agreed to some of the edits and created a talk page section. Remember to sign your name in the future with four tildes. Ylevental (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Task force climate change

Hello,

I saw you're one of the main editors of the Greta Thunberg. Given your interest in climate change related articles, I invite you to have a look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force. It's been inactive for a while, but I strongly believe that this topic should have an active group of collaborating editors to help each other with a critical eye. If you'd like to contribute, please add your name to the participants section, add some task to the to-do list or help make the to-do list a bit shorter.

Femke Nijsse (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)