User talk:Yintan/Archives/2017/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Yintan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Precious
"Caution: Vandalism" and punny days
Thank you for fighting vandalism, for images, for discussing, for support, for service in many of ten years, for a unique and well-cited user page with a starry infobox to which you can add that you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thank you very much! Yintan 21:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
I have nothing to do with that page
I merely restored the article about the Persian town that this user pasted over https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Corocurtis. Talk to them. --Mareklug talk 23:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, the beauty of scripts. Sorry about that, Mareklug. I'll send them a message. Yintan 23:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi - Confused
I removed a section that contradicts the information on other wiki pages - I didn't know I had to cite things to remove them -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polysaccharide-K which links to https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00262-006-0248-1
Putting that 'Mushrooms' specifically trametes versicolor are some sort of pseudoscience/unproven treatment actually risks lives and it seems very poorly researched... These do and have improved the quality of life of cancer patients while having efficacy as a treatment in itself.
Turning people away from this sort of thing could actually be harming lives... So please consider this carefully. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369477/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611103914909 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734975003000028 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845472/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.94.86.167 (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I undid your removal because you deleted cited material. If you have sources that claim mushrooms do work, and should therefore not be listed in the article as 'disproven', I suggest you start a discussion about this on the article's Talk page. Kind regards, Yintan 07:17, 27 May 2017 (UTC)