User talk:Yifeng Qi/sandbox

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jingkai Chen

[The paragraph is so interesting that it is enough to attract the attention from the reader. In addition, I definitely figure out what is the Lingnan architecture. It is well organized and I just leave small comments.-minae]

[I think the contents are great! I have two comments: you can add a link table so that people can find it easier; second, a short paragraph of introduction will be very useful to guide readers.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingkai Chen (talkcontribs) 04:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC) 16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Carrillazo1970 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I consider that it is a well written text. Although it has too much long phrases. Reading could be facilitated with shorter sentences. With regard to the content, I think it would be nice a little more detail in the information, for example, the dates. Some questions that come to my mind are: When did the style of architecture begin to develop? What is its importance in Chinese culture? Who is your most representative architect? I think they are data that would contribute a little more to knowledge of the arquitectonical style . In general, I think it is a good encyclopedic entry.

This comment was post by Ivan Carrillo


To do: Some more information in the first reference probably can be further added to this article.

This comment was post by Yifeng Qi