Welcome!

edit

Hello, Yevaraina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 10:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natasha Doshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit
 

  Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rachita Ram without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] It's unclear why you removed the image as you did not use an edit summary. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Sourcing and Suggestion

edit

Just to notify that IMDb is not considered a reliable source as per WP:UGC and so do Google searches. Also note that sites like FilmiBeat, IWMBuzz, Cinestan, TelyyChakkar, PinkVilla, etc are not considered reliable as per WP:ICTF and WP:RSN. Use reliable sources like Times of India, The Hindu, DNA, etc. This message was regarding this edit of yours. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've already explained to you why some sources like IMDb, IndiaGlitz, etc. are not considered reliable. BehindWoods is also not considered reliable unless the content depends on it, e.g. the BehindWoods Awards. Go through WP:ICTF and WP:RSN. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Other accounts?

edit

Have you had any other accounts at Wikipedia in the past? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

No I didn't.I am excited to see various articles in wikipedia..especially film field topics including south indian films... [[2]] (User talk:Yevaraina) 17:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cool - time to work on that SPI filing, it's close to enough. Ravensfire (talk) 01:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ram (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mollywood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Non-notable awards and poor referencing

edit

Re: this, don't add non-notable awards to articles. See WP:FILMCRITICLIST. We're not here to log every award someone won through some garbage fly-by-night award mill. And pick real references. And don't add awards to filmography tables when we have a dedicated award section. See WP:FILMOGRAPHY.

When you copy garbage from other poorly-constructed articles, you only propagate that garbage to new articles and inspire more people to keep spreading that garbage. We have community guidelines for a reason. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


  • but when you see in some articles and pages of many famous film stars...award lists are given in details to filmography...so can i remove all those??????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yevaraina (talkcontribs) 14:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Do you have trouble signing your posts properly? Sign them with four tildes please, like ~~~~. To answer your question, I'll ask you another question: When you see garbage on the street, does that mean it's okay to throw more garbage on the street? Or do you decide, "you know, maybe I'll put my garbage in a dust bin" or even better, "maybe I'll clean up the whole street!"? People who ignorantly fail to adhere to community standards aren't actually helping. If there is a list of awards in an article, then we don't need awards to be repeated elsewhere, do we? Why have the same information twice? So to answer your question, (which I shouldn't have to, if you read WP:FILMOGRAPHY) yes. Notes: This field is to include optional, additional information such as ... awards (when there is no separate "Awards" section in the given article) Thus, if there is an award section, we can extrapolate that we shouldn't add this content in the Notes field. Why am I repeating myself? To make it clear that repetition is annoying. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stop adding non-notable awards.

edit

Diff: [3] If an award doesn't have an existing Wikipedia article, where notability was properly established, don't add it. This is a general community principle mentioned at WP:FILMCRITICLIST. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Thank you...mention me if i do again this kind of mistakes..help me to learn more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yevaraina (talkcontribs) 19:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
You forgot to sign your post again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
You know, Yevaraina, I'm unclear on why you made this edit, after I explained very clearly what our content guidelines say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Sorry, I think JFW (https://jfwonline.com/) is a well known for women empowerment and supporting female artists icluding JFW Movie Awards 2020.That's why i provided that as a part of respect for women.
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Suriya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • I meant Film producer ,that's why i provided production house in the bracket.Thank you.anyway i re-edited by providing it with clarification.

Proposed deletion of Vimmi Mariam George

edit
 

The article Vimmi Mariam George has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable voice artist. Notability is in question. Previously deleted. No significant reliable resources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMySon 11:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


References

  1. ^ "State Film Awards (2000–12)". Kerala State Chalachitra Academy. Archived from the original on 7 July 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.

73357a631cd482164c18216bf78b3acfgr

June 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia[4] from another source[5] without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. FYI, I also suspect you of evading a previous block, when you edited as GOOD morning.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


This is not fair

edit

Dear adminstrator, Cyphoidbomb, (talk),

The page i created for Vimmi_Mariam_George was reminded me to fill the articles with proper evidence.so i approached for the article for further development of that page.you should have mentioned me.you should have guide me.you should have teach and adviced me.please unblock me,as i am interested in editing and who is GOOD morning?? i made my account (Yevaraina/ joined on 11/05/2019.i don't have any multilpe accounts till now??How can you make someone so down by pointing them as multiple user.??? please unblock me.YevarainaYevaraina talk04:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Yevaraina (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply

Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yevaraina (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The page i created for Vimmi_Mariam_George was reminded me to fill the artcles with proper evidence.so i approached for the article for further development of that page.you should have mentioned me.please unblock me,as i am interested in editing and who is GOOD morning?? i made my account / joined on 11/05/2019.i don't have any multilpe accounts till now??plaease unblock me.YevarainaYevaraina talk04:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Yevaraina (talk) 22:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

re - submission

edit
  • I am not GOOD morning.Don't put someone's name over me for their kinda of history.A coin has two sides.Like that hear my side also.this is not fair.wikipedian admins are making their own decisions as they are all own them.Remember about your starting here.we are young talents.don't kill us rom the very beggining.Remember about 'KARMA'.Yevaraina (talk) 12:45, 06 JuLYne 2020 (UTC)

Request

edit

hi,Boing! said Zebedee,Cyphoidbomb, (talk),DMySon

  • please i beg you to get back my account unblocked.i will not repeat what mistakes i have done..help me please.

I wish to be unblocked, i kindly request reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because me
    1. understand what i have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yevaraina (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply

Apology for unknown facts and mistakes

edit

Kindly requestng all the well qualified administrators - Boing! said Zebedee,Cyphoidbomb, (talk),DMySon etc. i am really sorry for what mistakes happened from my side.i wish to do more contributions here and study more about the editing field of wikipedia.please forgive me and guide me ... really i am begging you people to get back my account unblocked.i will not repeat what mistakes i have done..help me please. I wish to be unblocked, i kindly request reviewing administrator(s) that i will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yevaraina (talk) 12:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply

To any other admins who are reading this, note that GOOD morning was blocked for a number of concerns, including competency. Note the totality of these recent comments. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cyphoidbomb (talk, Please unblock my account...kindly seeking you for all my mistake ...don't suppress young talents like us.you are senior and respect you for your works.. Yevaraina (talk) 10:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply

Boing! said Zebedee,Cyphoidbomb, (talk),DMySon

edit
  • This is it.Pointing out at my mistake,is not the right way.??what about my contributions as a begginer.....you people are still negative..even i apologised you guys are still on your selfish way of depressing young talented like us..feeling very bad ....expected a positive response.... yeah nothing is permanent..

Yevaraina (talk) 10:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply


Vimmi Mariam George has been reviewed and got accepted

edit

Hi Cyphoidbomb (talk,

The page i created for artist Vimmi Mariam George was established as a page.Please remove my block...please... Yevaraina (talk) 10:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)}}Reply


Approve my request

edit

Respected admin, Boing! said Zebedee,Cyphoidbomb, (talk

  • kindly remove my block(talk) 02:25, 01 July 2020 (UTC)}}Reply
No. I believe that you are evading a previous block. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Plese help me

edit

sir/madam, VampireHeart

  • Fed up with all kind of request..help me to unblock please...

Yevaraina (talk) 02:30, 01 July 2020 (UTC)}}Reply


Am not that Suspected sockpuppets

edit
  • My account is my wish an am not a suspected sock puppet of GOOD morning


A coin has 2 sides

edit
  • My account is my wish an am not a suspected sock puppet of GOOD morning

Respected admin, Boing! said Zebedee,Cyphoidbomb, (talk

Without hearing my side and taking judgement & final declaration is not Justice

edit
  1. this is not fair

Please unblock my page

edit

{{unblock | reason=I AM NOT THE PERSON GOOD MORNING . PLEASE DON'T FORCEFULLY PUT SOMEONE'S BAD NAME OVER ME~~~~}}

Is this justice or injustice????????????


Look what the fake things the admins assumes



WTF is going

edit

Suspected sockpuppets????????????????????????????????????

edit
  • In the archive, one of the CU confirmed socks is RahulRosh07, which obviously has a name similarity with one of the reported sock suspects above.
  • Rahulravi06 has been a recent major contributor to Vimmi Mariam George.
  • From what I can tell looking through the deletion history, RahulRosh07 previously created the Vimmi Mariam George article.
  • Yevaraina, who I also suspect of evading a block as GOOD morning (who is long since stale), recently created Vimmi Mariam George.
  • It's an odd coincidence to me that shortly after this article was created, a user with a name similar to one of the Tyuuuri socks would start editing it. So this suggests to me that maybe there's some coordinated editing going on.
  • the Kerala State Film Award for Best Dubbing Artist is yet another article where all of these accounts intersect. I will also mention that Jyothu, a sock account of Navasuv has also edited both of these articles, having previously created the Vimmi Mariam George article too, so this could wind up being a master, although I don't know that anyone wants to get into that mess.

So, my hope is that while Tyuuuri and RahulRosh07 are more than likely stale, that someone can see if: 1) Rahulravi06 has any other accounts open. 2) If Yevaraina is related to Rahulravi06. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I Want Justice

edit

A doubt never becomes the truth.I still says am not multiple user. There are a lots of editors here.But blaming others for making people as the admins prey is really injustice.Blaming me with multiples names like Tyuuuri, RahulRosh07,Jyothu,Good Morning.....what the hell is this.....really very much untolerating things were went in the name of fucking investigations. Yevaraina (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

You guys are shamefull and corrupted

edit

Appealing

edit
{{unblock|still am saying i want justice..... please ublock me}}

Yevaraina (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Since you are now abusing your talk page privileges,[6] I've removed access. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply