Yellow79Red

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Operational performance management, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. The edit summaries you have made do not address the issues. The first one is that the article was created by an editor with an apparent conflict of interest, including "referencing" to their own blog (which is not an acceptable source). When advice was given to that editor (Progressly) about their username, they stopped editing, your account was created and you made these edits to the article. Are you therefore the same person as Progressly? If so, you still have a conflict of interest - changing your username doesn't remove that, and so you should not remove the maintenance tags, you should let another independent editor decide. Please clarify about this, thanks Melcous (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Yellow79Red, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Yellow79Red! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Your addition to Operational performance management has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Slashme (talk) 08:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)