Yashodhan Ganu

NPF Is Not Part Of NDA

Please Remove It And Place In Others Kumar8121 (talk) 10:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Biju Janata Dal, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop marking the Telangana Rashtra Samithi, Biju Janata Dal or YSR Congress Party as members of the NDA. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National Democratic Alliance (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding TRS, JDU and YSRCP to NDA. They are not a part of the NDA. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National Democratic Alliance (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding TRS, JDU and YSRCP to NDA. They are not a part of the NDA. Kumar8121 (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National Democratic Alliance (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding TRS, JDU and YSRCP to NDA. They are not a part of the NDA. Kumar8121 (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gilgit. - Arjayay (talk) 12:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 12:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of states and union territories of India by area. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Biju Janata Dal(BJD), YSR Congress and Telangana Rashtra Samiti(TRS) are not a part of NDA. You seem to have a history of cuh vandalism. Stop it Whiny teenager (talk) 06:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ladakh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of National Democratic Alliance members, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Democratic Alliance Plus (India)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on National Democratic Alliance Plus (India) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajya Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to National Democratic Alliance (India) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Please do not add YSRCP, TRS or BJD to the NDA. Just because they supported them in a few bill, it does not mean that they are a part of the alliance. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Mr Yashodhan Ganu

Why You Are Doing Some uneccessary Edits KumarVenati (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Democratic Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JSS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited States and union territories of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 10:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National Democratic Alliance (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. For the last time. Just because a party supported the NDA at any point, it does not make them members of the alliance. Stop adding, YSRC, TRS and BJD. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lok Sabha. ƬheStrikeΣagle 13:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Why are you feeding wrong info in Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly Page

Dear Ganu, I appreciate you as editor, however, as a responsible editor, kindly do not edit information that suits your whims and fancies. It seems you desperately want the BJP government to be installed in MP, Doing so on Wikipedia will not help or prevent it from happening. However, It will force people to believe in the information that is currently untrue (Maybe true in future)

Kindly refrain from irresponsible edits, you may otherwise be blocked permanently from editing. Srq365 (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bihar Legislative Assembly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Opposition and Others

National Democratic Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Independent

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Janata Dal (Secular) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Left Democratic Front

National Democratic Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lok Sabha, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, adding material without sources, and a complete failure to use talk pages after three previous blocks..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yashodhan Ganu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Misuse of talk page

I have reverted your recent contributions to this page which were calling for edits to articles you were originally blocked for editing disruptively. While you are blocked you may use your talk page to discuss your block with administrators or to make an unblock request. If you continue requesting edits to articles here your access to edit this page will be revoked. If you would like to make an unblock request please read the guide to appealing blocks. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)