So this is the place where we communicate, right? Tk1201 (talk) 02:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

OOOOh I finally know how to work this! Let do it!Hbgailb (talk) 04:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Testing, testing... 1, 2, 3. YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay so are we gonna stick with Ray-Ban??? Tk1201 (talk) 04:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yep, we are. It's too late to change now anyways, no?Hbgailb (talk) 04:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okidoki so basically we just start editing stuff on the sandbox, right? Tk1201 (talk) 04:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

SOMEONE STOLE OUR TOPIC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbgailb (talkcontribs) 04:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

ok....I have to sign thisHbgailb (talk) 04:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

ctrl + f is a pretty neat feature for computers. It allows you to easily search through a page to see if another group has already chosen your topic. YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 04:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_heels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baggy_pants http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinny_jeans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_top so these are my new suggestions :( Tk1201 (talk) 04:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juicy_Couture Hbgailb (talk) 04:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since now we have a new topic, and it's not too late. Let's decide on an outline and split the work! Hbgailb (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

RELEVANT LINKS: http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2008-08-14-juicy_N.htm AND http://www.juicycouture.com/The-History/about-history,default,pg.html. LET'S GET CRACKIN' YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay so Chris will edit what is already there on Wiki, Gail will do research and bring new information, then I will re-write and structure that new information... right? Tk1201 (talk) 05:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

So we have officially changed our plan. We are going to be editing the Juicy Couture page. Gail is going to be finding new, relevant information about the topic and adding it. Taewon is going to restructure the article, as well as add new divisions based on the information that Gail will be adding. Chris (myself) will be editing the article as it is (for language and citations) as well as editing the work of the other members. YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 05:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Added a bunch of new info, Taewon will be looking over those, and divided headings. Think I should erase the slogan part? seems abundant. Hbgailb (talk) 06:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

When Gail is done with adding new info, I'll start paraphrasing and then update the sandbox! Tk1201 (talk) 06:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can't find more info now.... Hbgailb (talk) 07:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

So I paraphrased new info that Gail put on, but not so much for the ones that were already there before. I put the photo that Gail wanted to put up, as well. I think it will be great if Chris can go over the whole article and check any errors or any advertisement-ish statement. I've cut out the ones that I felt it sounded like an ads. Please, feel free to edit the work that I did, too. I'll revisit if I can manage myself to be awake. Nice team work guys!!! Tk1201 (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, forgot to tell you guys but there were some parts that I didn't really get what it was originally trying to say so I just leave it like that so hope you guys can fix those awkward sentences. I think I found some on logo&slogan section. Tk1201 (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but for the headquarters, do you guys think we need to put this as a separate section? cause it's only like a sentence long so... if you have any idea, feel free to edit it! Tk1201 (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Chris, did you take out the P&G part? It's a lawsuit filed against them... Hbgailb (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Added it back in, and did most of the major edits. Should I put all the information in the sections in chronological order? Or is that too much? YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have edited everything to the best of my ability (some of the sentences were really awkward so I had to revise them quite a bit). Is there anything else that can be added / changed? Otherwise, we might want to just send this in! YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Final edits done, the title page is done, so should we submit? YAYAYAMCHA (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:New levels new devils.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:New levels new devils.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New levels new devils.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:New levels new devils.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply