Your submission at Articles for creation: 9ice Kidd (Musician) (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Xpillz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 15:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit
 

Hello Xpillz. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Xpillz. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Xpillz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't really understand these grammars, not even one. Please kindly explain some to me, thanks Xpillz (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do you work for 9ice Kidd? How do you know him? 331dot (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
9ice Kidd is my colleague,we are in the same music band,he has released 2 albums and 4 single. Xpillz (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You must read conflict of interest and make a formal declaration.
If your English ability is such that you are unable to understand these instructions, you may wish to edit a version of Wikipedia that is in a language with which you are more familiar. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the "premier" Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay,that not really the case.but please why my submission not qualifies for a wikipedia articles Xpillz (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You must show how your colleague meets our definition of a notable musician. Releasing an album is insufficient. 331dot (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay,but can you help me out,cus I have cite some reliable source to prove what I'm saying but still decline Xpillz (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
As I said, you must show that your colleague meets our definition of a notable musician. Click those words to review the definition, and then tell me which part or parts of it he meets. 331dot (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Has been the subject of multiple,non trivail published wors, appearing in sources that are reliable, not self piblished. He has surely meet this. Xpillz (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
What are those? Can you link to them? They must not be interviews, press releases, announcements, or brief mentions, they must have in depth, significant coverage. For musicians, that is usually reviews of their work by professional reviewers. 331dot (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No,not interview,or press, nothing like anouncement or briefly mentioned. That page has 4 paragraphs and I have cited all. Total citation that I made was even 6. It should be accepted please, kindly assist me Xpillz (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Your sources are
  1. a very brief biography of him
  2. another very brief mention of him
  3. another brief mention of him
  4. appears to be nonfunctional
  5. a link to the lyrics of one of his songs
  6. a very brief Q&A about who wrote one of his songs
None of these establish notability. You need sources with extensive coverage of him. 331dot (talk) 17:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay.so before the page could be accepted what could I really do Xpillz (talk) 17:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you do not have independent reliable sources with significant coverage of him, there is nothing you can do at this time. 331dot (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9ice Kidd (Musician) (October 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9ice Kidd (Musician) (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 14:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9ice Kidd (Musician) (October 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9ice Kidd (Musician) (October 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Phuzion (talk) 03:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:9ice Kidd (Musician), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:9ice Kidd (Musician)

edit

  Hello, Xpillz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:9ice Kidd (Musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply