Xpendersx

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Xpendersx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 23 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 699 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Corey Simon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Gerard Warren - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ronde Barber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Duce Staley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Joey Browner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Henry Ellard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Robert Brooks - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Steve McMichael - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Keith Byars - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Buddy Ryan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ray Cappo

The article Ray Cappo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find reliable sources of information about Cappo. All the ones I can find are about the bands rather than him. This article has been unsourced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Reuel Marc Gerecht for deletion

The article Reuel Marc Gerecht is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuel Marc Gerecht until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jimmy Bower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Bower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Bower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Girth Summit _(blether) 21:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Byron Brown

Byron Brown has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of One Life Crew for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Life Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Life Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Woodroar (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC)